I'm talking about people that has been enforcing the same policy as Commons
has on the Spanish Wikipedia previously. At es: we have been enforcing an
"only free material" policy for two years, while uploads were closed just a
few months ago. Being able to learn how to perform the same task in Commons
is easy: just learn how to use a few templates and you are ready.
In Commons I have deleted more than 1.500 pictures and nobody (but obvious
vandals) have complained about. I one case I restored about 20 images
deleted because nsd/nld because the user kindly asked and gave good reasons:
deletin an image is no big deal, it can be restored. I think I'm I useful to
Commons, but of course I don't know how to use every single template and
procedure available.
So I'm not asking to remove the 200 edits policy, I'm asking people (like
you) to support the nomination of these experienced people from es: as
Commons admins.
Barcex
2006/11/15, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com>om>:
On 11/14/06, Barcex <lv.cabc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'll post a similar message in the Spanish
Wikipedia list. In fact I was
asking some current es: admins about that, but they wonder to be
rejected
because they have not enough edits on Commons. I
suggest as criteria to
be
open to accept Spanish Wikipedia admins that have
many contributions
there
and were fighting image vandalism also before
uploads were closed a few
months ago.
Admins don't have a monopoly on doing good work. :)
I think it's important enough that admins be well invested and
integrated into commons practices, and it's easy enough to become an
admin on commons (~200 edits) that I wouldn't be inclined to support a
fast path at this time.
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l