Thanks Finn R,
Your answer helped,
Best regards,
Huib
_____
Van: commons-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:commons-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] Namens Finn Rindahl
Verzonden: zondag 15 februari 2009 14:58
Aan: Wikimedia Commons Discussion List
Onderwerp: Re: [Commons-l] Policy
Let's not open the whole debate again, to (hopefully) answer Huivs question
- there is a other policy and a way to implement it, see
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators/Inactivity_section
There was a new run scheduled for february 6th, but it doesn't seem anyone
felt that organising this was their responsibility. (Anyone could have done
it, but everyone thought someone else would do it in so noone did). I'm
waiting for someone else myself ;)
Finn R
2009/2/15 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
Hoi,
The notion that you "have to" desysop people when they are inactive is a
falacy on several levels. When people are trusted, they can imho be an
admin. In many ways it is an old debate but the difference is that you
delete people.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/2/15 <abigor(a)forgotten-beauty.com>
Hello,
I need some information I can't really fin don Commons.
We have a policy that says you have to do 5 admin actions in 6 months to
keep your adminship, we have sererval users that doesn't have any admin
actions for more than a year, can those user be desysoped on Meta or is
there a other policy?
Best regards,
Huiv
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l