I vote b) and I'm only responsible for one repo right now, which I hope
will become increasingly remarkable :)
But that's just a fork of /wikimedia/limn. How are we handling forks?
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:02 PM, evan rosen <erosen(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi Quim,
There are a few things worth mentioning about the repos I am responsible
for:
these repos should be deleted, or at least not publicized:
analytics/global-dev/reportcard
analytics/global-dev/misc
this repo is hosted on gerrit and github, but they are not yet synced
and the github version is the most up to date:
main:
https://github.com/embr/sqproc
out of date mirror:
analytics/global-dev/sqproc
I also have a variety of github projects which are not tracked on
gerrit but are analytics-y, though i don't think any of them would
qualify as remarkable:
https://github.com/embr/limnpy
https://github.com/embr/userstats
https://github.com/embr/gcat
evan
On 10/22/12, Andrew Otto <otto(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi Quim!
Probably b), with these as 'remarkable':
analytics/gerrit-stats
analytics/udp-filters
analytics/udplog
Also, there are these on Github:
https://github.com/wikimedia/limn
https://github.com/wmf-analytics/puppet-cdh4
On Oct 22, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Quim Gil <quimgil(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, these days I'm polishing the presence of the Wikimedia Foundation at
>
http://ohloh.net in order to help promoting all the cool open suce
> projects we are developing.
>
> The Analytics team has a nice section in Gerrit including many projects
> (see below). How would you prefer to have this reflected in Ohloh?
>
> a) All repos under a generic Wikimedia Analytics project.
>
> b) A few remarkable projects on its own (e.g. reportcard,
gerrit-stats...)
> and the rest under a common umbrella.
>
> c) Each repo has its own project.
>
> Option A is easier to implement but offers less level of detail. Option
C
might add
too much fragmentation if there are many tiny and not so
relevant projects. I can go for the option you prefer.
Also let me know if there are repos not worth of listing in Ohloh e.g.
internal stuff, playgrounds, data only repos interesting only for WMF
dudes...
Thank you!
--
Quim
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics