Sorry - this is my bad for not tying these threads together.
I saw that Dan suggested we replace vanadium at the same time we move the master. I've
been concerned about EL capacity for a while now and it seemed like a good chance to take
some downtime and fix both issues.
At the very least we should co-ordinate the process. What do we need to do this?
On Feb 21, 2015, at 16:59, Nuria Ruiz
<nuria(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Looks like Ori is working on replacing vanadium.
There is a ticket created to that effect:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90363
However, I am not sure the best way to proceed forward is to change two things at the
same time (the db and vanadium).
But since that is purely and ops tasks you guys know what's best.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Sean Pringle
<springle(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Dan Andreescu <dandreescu(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
It seems to me that we should do the Vanadium
hardware upgrade at the same
time, if we're going to have down time anyway. Can we bring the new beefier
box online? Last time I talked to Ori I understood such a box was already
set aside for this by ops.
Oooh I didn't (and don't) know about this. Fair enough; one chunk of
scheduled downtime is fine with me, though I don't know how long it
will need to be if we include vanadium. If we do only the database
split it will be five minutes.
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics