Brion Vibber <brion@...> writes:
Brion Vibber wrote:
Sorry to be short about this, but we've had enough fights over this issue in
the past, and as far as I'm concerned the decisions have been made. I'll get
flak no matter whether I implement the previously-agreed conversion
specification or something new, so it's lose-lose for me personally. ;)
However to summarize, my view on why a single namespace is Good includes a few
points:
What do you plan on using for the single-sign-on transition (from a
technological standpoint)? Is this posted somewhere? I wasn't aware until
recently that this would be happening soon. This discussion sparked my curiosity.
Ryan Lane