On 12/18/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That's a pity - 70,000 users is really quite a
high-resolution sample
[*]; it's a pity their sample selection is evidently crappy.
Three cheers for the self-selecting sample.
On 12/18/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
They'll be reading this thread and want the real
numbers? ;-)
Well, the link has been given... and the same data has been previously
provided to other donors, it's just that it never made it onto the
pages.
The graphs themselves are a bit hard to read because the daily
volatility swamps the short term growth... If only I there were stocks
which I could trade that followed our traffic patterns.
Keep in mind that roughly 2/3 of the overall requests are images, so a
correction must be applied to convert req/s to approximate page
views/src.