Moin,
On Thursday 06 April 2006 23:49, Conrad Dunkerson wrote:
Ray Saintonge wrote:
But Joe User still needs to plug information into
the template.
Yes, the ability to type is still required. We haven't simplified
things THAT much. :]
Or in
the course of ordinary editing he runs into a template which is not
suitable to his subject, but it's beyond his technical capacity to
trace the problem.
In which case they ALSO wouldn't have been able to figure out the
markup which the template has replaced/simplified. No, we can't
anticipate everything that every user might want to do and have a nice
simple pre-packaged way of making that happen all ready for them....
but that strikes me as an illogical reason for not setting up utility
templates at all.
I'll never understand the 'it might be too complex so let's not do it'
argument... setting aside that this just ISN'T complicated stuff, even
if it WERE it doesn't TAKE AWAY anything. All the older methods of
doing things are still there. Just now there are additional ways of
getting things done - and if not everyone understands those, so what?
It isn't hurting the people who don't. Indeed, it helps even those who
don't understand the logic because all they need to know is the name of
the template to call... not how it works.
You don't need to know how to
build an automobile in order to drive one.
Software is not an automobile. That confusion is why we have so many
broken and buggy programs, invalid webpages etc.
The 'we are building an encyclopedia not programming' argument is
equally unmoving to me. Ok then... get rid of all HTML font settings,
colors, tables, CSS, templates, et cetera. Oh, those are USEFUL for
building an encyclopedia? Hmmm.... imagine that. I wonder if automatic
distance conversions in articles would be useful... given that some of
our readers (and editors) use imperial and some use metric? Temperature
scales? Weights?
But do you really need to:
* invent yet-another-language, poorly
* create yet-another-interpreter for it
* create yet-another-lets-mix-data-and-code environemnt (think PHP, think
javasript) for it?
I am not that against these functions. I just don't want horder of
unexperienced people who think they can program because they know how to
add two numbers up inject hundred or thousands little "programs" into the
wikipedia. Wikipedia is a data collection. Do not turn it into a code
repository.
Now I think I have said everything there is to say on that topic, about
three times. So I shut up now. You have been warned :D
Best wishes,
Tels
--
Signed on Fri Apr 7 01:42:27 2006 with key 0x93B84C15.
Visit my photo gallery at
http://bloodgate.com/photos/
PGP key on
http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.
"Ok, a shiny copper piece to the first person who can tell me why Elan
is running around naked." - "Giant moth attack?" - "Maybe a bad guy
casted 'Dispel clothes'?" - The Order of the Stick issue #26