On Saturday 23 July 2005 21:23, Heiko Evermann wrote:
Hi Gerard,
In my opinion, Wiktionary should not have
redirects. A word is either
spelled correctly and it will have its lemma or it is not and there will
not be a lemma with the incorrect spelling.
In Brions opinion there are links to lemmas and as we need to ensure
that these links remain ok, we need redirects to make this possible.
This might work for English, but not for all languages.
I think that redirects should be possible. This would make sense for
1) verb conjugation. I would like to simply link most of the declination
forms to the main verb entry, as long as no other language entry uses the
same heading.
Example: Low Saxon conjugation of "to be".
"He was" => "he weer". I would simply redirect this to
"wesen" (en: to be).
I would not like to be forced to write a whole article stating that "he
weer" is 3. person sing, simple present of "wesen". I would like to
include
the conjugation table only once.
2) dialect variations (of which we have a lot in Low Saxon): for "to be" we
have "ween/wesen/sien" as regional dialects. I would redirect two of them
to the "wesen". I would not like to be forced to write a whole article
stating that "ween" is a variant of "wesen".
3) orthography variations. We also have several competing orthographies for
Low Saxon. I would like to be able to just redirect to the main orthography
that we use.
Even if redirects would be allowed, you should do any of this by filling in
the database correctly. Each declination of a word would have its own entry.
Dialect variations would all be present, and marked as belonging to a dialect
or subdialect (the end of my discussion with Gerard is about how exactly to
do this). There is a field "spellingauthority" where you could specify which
of competing orthographies endorses particular spelling of a word.