On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 11:43:18AM -0500, Poor, Edmund W wrote:
Um, there is, I, (pause to remove foot from mouth)
Reducing time from .99 to .97 doesn't sound very important. But I still
think that efforts to reduce page delivery time are important. Any idea,
no matter how far-fetched, should be considered.
Naturally, the proof is in the pudding. So after we try a given
optimization, we ought to measure the results and see if it really gets
the pages to the users any faster.
Ed "Sheepish" Poor
Sorry to be a balloon burster. ;) Do we have any recent profiling on
the code that shows where the bottleneck is? I imagine most of the time
is spent poking about in the database. If that truly is the case,
developer time would best be spent trying to maybe optimize the database
layout or adding support for a faster database...
--
Nick Reinking -- eschewing obfuscation since 1981 -- Minneapolis, MN