On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:58:00PM +0200, Erik Moeller wrote:
Tomasz-
Cologne Blue has no special pages combobox,
Neither does Standard after my last update.
Then you're the one who's going to piss many users ;-)
so it needs
big link to Special
Pages.
That's not a logical conclusion. Whether links should be emphasized should
depend on their frequency of use. You can't judge this frequency since it
varies from user to user. Therefore any emphasis you add will likely piss
off some users who have different priorities.
It's seriously much less individual issue that you claim it to be.
Show me a person who uses "Edit help" more often than "Edit", and
"List images" more often than "Recent Changes". Well, boldening link
to Special pages may be debatable, but I don't see any good reasons against it.
In any case it looks much better than "everything bold".
Testing is
part of developement process, not something to be done after
developement is finished.
True, and I expect you to test the code you write before committing it to
CVS. Test.wiki is only for the final stage of testing by a larger
audience, and certainly not for committing unfinished stuff. Otherwise we
just end up with incomplete code like the interlanguage links, the
category system etc.
If you meant testing if it doesn't throw PHP parse error, then yeah,
I've done that on local machine. But for styles you need lot of wide audience
testing, and modify it in process.