Rotem,
I think you are working from a few assumptions, some of which may not
apply, and I would like to take some time to help you understand this.
Firstly, you seem to have a certain perception of possession. You seem
to think that if you are the one to create a Hebrew Wikipedia, you will
be the one to have full command over it. This is probably similar to how
some athors consider articles they write as "theirs" and get annoyed
when other people edit them; however, one of the fundamental basics of
Wikipedia is that we are a collaborative group, and neither an article,
nor a whole Wikipedia, is under the control of anyone.
Secondly, you seem to regard the Hebrew Wikipedia, or the idividiual
Wikipedias in general, as more separate than they actually are (or
should be). Although technically they are separate installations of the
Wikipedia software and use separate databases, they should ideally be,
or at least look like, parts of a whole. All the Wikipedias collectively
form the entire complete Wikipedia project. If you'd change the licence
of the Hebrew texts, it wouldn't be Wikipedia anyway. The different
language Wikipedias are interwoven in many ways not only by the
Inter-Wiki links, but also by ideologies like NPOV and the GFDL, as well
as a common PHP codebase that will remain the same for all of them.
Now the layout. You do know that we have three distinct layouts already,
right? We have "Standard", "Nostalgia" and "Cologne Blue".
If you are
absolutely convinced that a significant majority of Hebrew readers will
dislike all three of them (which, frankly, I highly doubt, because I
don't see how the layouts are so overly dependent on a cultural
background or writing direction), then there is always the possibility
of creating a new layout. Although this new layout will, if the majority
agrees, be default on the Hebrew Wikipedia, it will automagically be
available to all Wikipedia users in their preferences.
I hope this clears up a few matters,
Timwi