Tomasz Wegrzanowski <taw(a)users.sourceforge.net> writes:
Era of consistency online is over, can't you see
it ?
Everyone and his dog is abusing CSS and stuff.
Well, I use links, and edit wikipedia exclusively with netscape 3, so I'd
imagine that I don't see it...
Let me check my favourite sites with Mozilla :
www.guardian.co.uk => links underlined
news.bbc.co.uk => links underlined (when I mouse-over them)
slashdot.org => links underlined
wikipedia.org => links underlined
espn.com => links underlined
baseballprospectus.com => links underlined
google.com => links underlined
www.quotationspage.com => links underlined
(except in nav-bars when they underline on mouse-over)
ussmariner.blogspot.com => Yea! Found one. Links *not* underlined
They are bold though, which looks just as silly when chained together
1 out of 9. Colour me unimpressed.
--
Gareth Owen
"I love the wikipedia, but sometimes I get the impression that certain people
on this list are very bored, and so argue about something when there's really
bugger all to argue about. Edit some articles, for god's sake." -- LP