[Wikipedia-l] Central bibliography

Tue Sep 5 19:16:12 UTC 2006

Hoi,
The great thing is you can observe how WiktionaryZ is doing, that may prove
that my optimism can indeed be compared to the reliable Swiss watch.

You deny the argument for Wikicat to need Wikidata. I wonder what you base
this on. It is given what it aims to do perfectly reasonable.
Thanks,
    GerardM

On 9/5/06, Lars Aronsson <lars at aronsson.se> wrote:
>
> Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> > Lars Aronsson wrote:
> > >
> > > When anybody says we "have to" introduce completely new markup or
> > > we "have to" wait for Wikidata to be implemented, then I know it's
> > > just an excuse for doing nothing.
> > >
> > Based on what ? WiktionaryZ is developing nicely,
>
> Gerard, your promotion of Wikidata is as predictable as a Swiss
> watch.  I admire your optimism.  In this case, however, I was
> talking about the tendency to use its name as an excuse for not
> doing something else.  In the case of Wikicat, I don't think it's
> the Wikidata technology component that is lacking.
>
>
> --
>   Lars Aronsson (lars at aronsson.se)
>   Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>