On 9/1/06, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 01/09/06, Akash Mehta <draicone(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
"Out of the 78,977 categories, 12,252 are
not assigned to any article"
Is it that bad, or are these categories just assigned to user
talk/wikipedia/etc. namespace pages and therefore not counted?
There's quite a few cats which serve only to group subcategories, and
don't have any articles that belong in them.
[[Category:American people by occupation]], for example - all the
articles belong in subcategories, and as these are pretty disparate
categories there's no article really dealing with the subject of the
main category.
--
- Andrew Gray
Wait, isn't that encouraged? I had thought that most categories were
supposed to categorize categories, and only the terminal categories
were supposed to have articles in them - ex. [[Category:Free
software]] should have only categories in it, not articles on
software.
~maru