Ilya N. wrote:
I don't have much experience on WikiBooks, but
wasn't this what Wikibooks
was founded for?
I don't agree that the original planned purpose of Wikibooks must
necessarily limit its scope forever. Besides, the very name "Wikibooks"
is far too suggestive to stop people in the long-run from using it for
the creation of books-that-aren't-textbooks (non-text books?).
Besides, what is a textbook, anyway? If the "guidelines for people on
the autistic spectrum" book is not allowed, why is the "Lucid Dreaming"
book allowed? What does 'allowed' mean, anyway, given that it survived a
community discussion on deletion?
Besides, how would you cite anything for something
like the books
mentioned?
There are plenty of potential citations available for books on autism.
As for the "how to get a girl", there's always psychological studies you
can cite -- but then again, do you even need cites for such a book?
Timwi