Seems, that you assign somedy else's thoughts to me, which is not a
good habit. I have never told Romanian (and/or Modovan) is a Slavic
language.
As for the myth about this or that alfabet fitting better or worse to
this or that language, I even don't wont to discuss it. A good
alphabet is a phonematic one ("one phoneme" <--> "one symbol"),
and
the shape of letters is just an accessory thing.
2005/12/5, Wikipedia Romania (Ronline) <rowikipedia(a)gmail.com>om>:
You probably
don't know the history of the language well. In fact both
Romanian and Moldovans has been Orthodox Christians and used Cyrillic
script for several ages. The modern Latin script is relatively a news
in both lands. So one can's speak in such a self-confindent way about
Moldovan Cyrillics as "decreed in the unfree days". By the way, do you
know much about the unfree days? They were not totally that "unfree".
:) Be more neutral. ;)
For some reason, Slavic people seem to think that "Romania is really just a
Slavic language that has only recently tried to affirm itself as
Latin/Romance". Not only you, but others as well. Romanian, while influenced
by Slavic languages to a degree, is still overwhelmingly Romance and the
Latin alphabet is the best alphabet to represent it...
--
Esperu cxiam!