[Wikipedia-l] Why do we not make it clear that Wikipedia is a work in progress?

Tue Dec 6 14:13:29 UTC 2005

Brion Vibber wrote:
> Why is there not a big, fat, clear warning at the top of every article that this
> is a work in progess, has not been formally reviewed, may contain factual
> inaccuracies or vandalism, and *should not* be used for reference without a very
> large grain of salt?

For enwiki, we can discuss this at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Tagline#Work_in_progress
perhaps?

Gerrit.

-- 
Temperature in Luleå, Norrbotten, Sweden:
| Current temperature   05-12-06 15:09:50   -6.9 degrees Celsius ( 19.6F) |
-- 
Det finns inte dåligt väder, bara dåliga kläder.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/attachments/20051206/031f6aef/attachment.pgp 