[Wikipedia-l] toki pona

Wed Sep 22 12:01:14 UTC 2004

Angela_ wrote:

>On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:59:17 -0400, James R. Johnson wrote:
>  
>
>>Isn't Klingon copyrighted?
>>    
>>
>If a language can be copyrighted, then it is, but I don't know what
>the implications of that are since I wrote to Paramount about this at
>the start of June and got no reply.
>  
>
I would be surprised if you did.  The question must certainly not be new 
to them.  Any enterring into correspondence by them would only 
complicate their position since that could commit them to something that 
is contrary to their interests.  When such companies feel that their 
copyright is threatened they prefer to let the matter be handled by 
their lawyers. If they do not feel threatened they do nothing.

Ec