Not sure what's *horrible* about no derivative
works. Wikipedia
doesn't need to alter most images. I'd take cc-nd over copyrighted
with fair use. If cc-nd is completely unacceptable, then so is fair
use, right?
A
It seems obvious to me that No Deriviative Works
is completely
unacceptable.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
I've dual licensed my images under cc-by-sa (attribution, share alike).
This seems to closest to the GFDL and I believe to be copyleft.
Caroline/Secretlondon