Not sure
what's *horrible* about no derivative works. Wikipedia doesn't
need to alter most images. I'd take cc-nd over copyrighted with fair
use. If cc-nd is completely unacceptable, then so is fair use, right?
The GFDL states that third-generation copiers can alter the work,
so long as they maintain its history. If you say that about work
you only have cc-nd or fair use rights to, you're in violation.