Ian Mackinnon wrote:
I strongly request that the Traditional Chinese
version of Wikipedia be
given it's own language space...
A real good argument I can give for this is why does
wikipedia have
simple.wikipedia.org for "Simple English" instead of it being lumped into
en.wikipedia.org?
I don't feel this is a strong argument for splitting Traditional and
Simplified Chinese. The Simple English Wikipedia has only attracted
1500 articles so far. I expect it may have been far more successful
had it been better merged with the English Wikipedia at the beginning.
Angela.