* Brian Corr <BCorr(a)NEAction.org> [2004-04-16]:
... (long snip).
I appreciate that we want to weigh carefully the decision to remove
someone's adminship, but it's clear to me that he received it by a
carefully planned course of action -- perhaps even "scheming" is not too
strong a word here -- and that he has not acted responsibly.
Notice that this is a very strong personal attack, even though you may
have thought carefully about it (of what I am sure). Especially because it
judges intentions (basically he wanted consciouly to deceive). This is
what I DO NOT see as a proper reason for desysoping. However:
While he may
end one specific problematic behavior, he often seems to find one that he
hasn't been specifically warned about. To me, he obeys the letter of the
law, but no its spirit.
Now this is a good reason, no intentions, no hidden motives. I agree that
*if this is the case*, de-sysoping him ought to be taken as a serious
possibility. But I fear there are no adverts at his talk pages but since
today or yesterday and I fear taking action against someone without using
the proper channels will end up in a nasty and awful precedent. This is
for me the main reason to ask
a) That Perl not be de-sysoped for now
b) That if someone feels a sysop is misbehaving, (s)he be told AT HIS/HER
talk page.
So I urge that he is desysopped, that the current
policy proposal is
reviewed by people and adopted, and that Perl can reapply if he wishes, and
that the community can make a decision.
Thanks,
Brian (Bcorr)
Pedro.
--
Pedro Fortuny Ayuso:
http://pfortuny.sdf-eu.org
Colegio Mayor PeƱafiel, Universidad de Valladolid
C/ Estudios 6, 47005 Valladolid, Spain -->
www.cmpenafiel.org
pfortuny(a)sdf-eu.org Tfn. Nr. 34 983 298277