The problem with voting on something like this is that
most of us
understand absolutely nothing about it. This effectively leaves the
decision in the hands of the techno-nerds.
For those of us who stand outside of that elite crowd, we are most
likely to ask
1) What does the result look like? and
2) How easy is it to use?
It seems from the meta article that some of these proposals may be
easily learned, (but I can't be sure.) On the other hand, except for a
couple of very short mathematical expressions, there are no examples of
what these might look like, particularly for the hieroglyphics and
musical material.
I fully recognize that several specialized subjects require specialized
tools, and they should be available to those who want to write about
such subjects. I hope that whatever is adopted will be adequately
documented for the rest of us. Also a person who wants to enter music
(for example) should not need to learn how to enter mathematical formulas.
I create a page to allow people to see syntax proposal with concrete
examples:
http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extension_Syntax/Example
Please remember the vote is about finding syntax to encapsulate extensions,
not to decide the syntax of the extensions themselves.
Aoineko