On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 05:47:46PM +0200, Lars Aronsson wrote:
Does Latin meet that requirement? The aboriginal Sami
minority in
I'm sure there are more than 10000 people who knows latin. At least every
doctor in Hungary ought to. :)
If this is the problem, why not solve this problem.
Split the lists
in two or three different lists: Languages with more than 20K articles
can be considered "useful" encyclopedias, languages with 1K-20K
articles can be listed as "developing" encyclopedias, and languages
with less than 1K articles are "experimental".
Allright. So I am going on with my bot to create year articles (let's start
with 3000), and create cities (~4500) and maybe country templates and ...
and...
Yep. We have ~600 articles, but they are _real_. Not templates. Not
automatically created. I believe I can create around 10000 of those without
much thinking. So we can be "useful" in, say, I week. Progress is fast
nowadays, isn't it?
(All I wanted to say: article count isn't god's way to rate us. Apart from
the problem that there ain't no god.)
--grin
ps: ...on the other hand the number of speakers of a language.... (much
harder to boost artifically)