Timwi-
I have the feeling your changes are only gradually
taking effect on
test.wikipedia.org.
As I said, the software does not consider changes to the stylesheet
relevant enough to tag its cached pages as expired, so you'll have to log
in to see these changes immediately (only anons get static pages).
I'm not seeing this change, so I'll look back
at it tomorrow, but I
don't think this will convince me.
Sorry, but you're simply a minority. There's only so much that can be
reasonably done to meet your concerns. Putting annoying fat borders on
every page is IMHO not an option.
Well, actually the previous heading appeared bolder to
me than the
current one does. However, this is due to the particular font I've set
in my browser (Verdana) and its habit of suddenly getting quite a bit
fatter from one point size to the next. I understand most people use
Times New Roman instead. However, if it doesn't upset too many people,
if you could change it just slightly from 125% to 130%?
OK.
Yeah, sorry. At the time I still had the yellow
backgrounds. I see the
new colour now, and to be honest, it's too light for me to distinguish
directly from the pure white of real articles (I'm on an LCD).
I think that's great -- the colors should only give a weak indication that
you're on a different page type, not dominate the entire layout as the
yellow does. Wiki can be operated reasonably well without that
information.
What about the simple grey meta uses? But then again,
it'd be
indistinguishable from meta.
I don't think every Wiki needs its own color set.
Regards,
Erik