[Wikipedia-l] Racialisme

Fri Jan 31 20:04:18 UTC 2003

Le Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:22:43 -0800, 
inspiré Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> écrivait la plume alerte :
....
>  Accepting that distinction did not make them racist.  Nobody owns the
>  word.
Yes, you are right, so I clearly stated in the definition it was a
"cache sexe" for racism.

> 
....
> Why shouldn't they be?  If these phenomena exist, they need to be 
> described fairly.  That doesn't mean agreeing with them.  A racist 
> article and an article about racism are two different things.
This is easy : 
racism means there is a difference between race. If in the article we
show there is no such things as human races, how can you use a term such
anti-caucasian racism without implying first there are different races,
and as a consequence that regarding the race that are concerned the
racism is different !!! If racism are different regarding the «race» you
can compare them and say : oh anti-negro racism is worse than
anti-caucasian racism or else. 
We face a contradiction in term like military music, and it also means
we are not self consistent in our definitions. 
> 
> >However, I do not support the idea to block people who write racist
> >articles. It's counter-productive. It's better to correct their
> >articles and show them the limit (as defined by the law in France).
> >And this as long as they are few and we can correct their articles.
> >
Yes, but how should  we face a massive and biased change of the
definition. 

> The difficulty here is who decides what French law means?
It is secondary, first how do we handle conflicts regarding the
infringement of the editorial rules concerning objectivity.

> 
> Eclecticology
Ethylocology,

-- 
Julien Tayon
http://www.tayon.net/			       http://libroscope.org/
Si la vérité est une femme, essayons de la séduire avant de la saisir.