[Wikipedia-l] Racialisme

Fri Jan 31 12:55:56 UTC 2003

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

It's me who put this in the "racialisme" article. The word may be used by 
quite some people, but I really think that it was invented by racist groups 
and people to justify racism. Links in Google don't and can't justify 
anything.

And I also redirected the articles about "racisme anti-blanc" and "racisme à 
l'envers" to "racisme". Personnally I don't think such articles should be in 
Wikipedia. I think that it doesn't improve the quality and reputation of 
Wikipedia.

But if a great number of people think I am wrong, then put back these 
articles.

However, I do not support the idea to block people who write racist articles. 
It's counter-productive. It's better to correct their articles and show them 
the limit (as defined by the law in France). And this as long as they are few 
and we can correct their articles.

Regards,
Yann

PS: I didn't subscribed to this list. So cc: me if necessary.

> Anthere, do you read my mails ?????
> I don't say racialism don't exist because there are not in the dictionnary.
> I said this word is not french, so we have to think about how to handle this
> kind of case.
> And what is the criteria that make a word that don't exist officially can be
> add in an encyclopedie or not ?
> I'm not the one that put the poor definition of racialism yesterday and I'm
> not the one who have removed [racisme antiblanc] and [racisme inverse].
> Please stop firing in the whole.

< Aoineko

- -- 
http://www.forget-me.net
Alternatives sur le Net
http://keys.indymedia.org/showkey.py?key=0A34CBDA
gpg --keyserver keys.indymedia.org --recv-key 0A34CBDA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+OnJcm4KYjQo0y9oRAryFAKCQ1xsg8enBe8ozEjE6E6mmcXPyGACfd0l6
k4iLwVzFCwVKb8+VS26HqY8=
=QoDP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----