[Wikipedia-l] A quick thought about 1.0

Peter Jaros rjaros at shaysnet.com
Thu Dec 18 04:41:56 UTC 2003


Sorry if this is a doublepost...

In article
<87hdzz47r1.fsf at unicorn.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us>,
  Evan Prodromou <evan-+DxIcwYt55H9qxiX1TGQuw at public.gmane.org> wrote:

 > >>>>> "JW" == Jimmy Wales 
<jwales-KK9S75Hv+MAAvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>
 > >>>>> writes:
 >
 >     JW> But I have this counter-thought -- while I do agree that the
 >     JW> idea of 1.0 has been causing people to do some things that I
 >     JW> don't really think are best, I think the solution to this is
 >     JW> to hurry up and actually implement a plan/software/whatever to
 >     JW> permit those who have deletionist tendencies (no insult meant
 >     JW> by the term!) to work on that.
 >
 > I wonder if there's a way to use fields metadata:
 >
 >   http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field-value_pairs
 >
 > ...to start tagging articles for 1.0. Say, "[[release=1.0]]" or
 > something.
 >
 > ~ESP


Cosider this my voice of support.  Or this:

http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Field-value_pairs

Peter

(P.S. Please consider this a shameless plug for a conversation and not 
an even more shameless 'me too' post.)




More information about the Wikipedia-l mailing list