On 12/31/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
<snip />
To be more precise the turn off to the left is to
"Arafat Makkah", the
actual holy site in Mecca. The sign going to the right has two arrows,
which suggests two lanes. Why, in a country that is predominantly
Muslim, would the infidel minority get two lanes while the dominant
religious group get only one? Traffic control can be a serious problem
at the time of the Hajj.
I'm sorry, but I'm having a little bit of trouble understanding the
reason for saying this. The assertion that you seem to be disputing is
that non-Muslims are not allowed in Mecca. You reply with a) a
technical nit-pick about non-Muslims being allowed into Mecca, just
not Arafat Makkah, and what seems to be a complaint about traffic
problems during the Hajj. I, and everyone who gets a full inbox of
this stuff would, I think, appreciate every byte of the message to be
full of meaningful information that is apropos to the topic.
To answer point (a) above, would you still object if the statement was
that non-Muslims are not allowed into "Arafat Makkah". With this
statement, Oldak Quill's point is still valid -- the comparison to
Apratheid is better made with the Saudis than with Israel.
The Latter Day Saints do not allow non-Mormons into
their inner temple
in Salt Lake City, and I find no reason to be upset about that.
This is a bad analogy for two reasons:
1. Two wrongs do not make a right -- just because the Latter Day
Saints go around prohibiting people from entering their inner temple
doesn't give me moral grounds on which to do the same thing.
2. The reason I'm not (being a non-Mormon) allowed into the temple of
the Latter Day Saints has to do with it being private property, giving
them the right to arbitrarily refuse entrance to anyone they choose,
much like my home. The reason I'm not (being a non-Muslim) allowed to
enter Arafat Makkah is because the government of Saudi Arabia has
passed a law forbidding it.
The photo adds no commentary, and is accompanied by a
misleading title.
Looking further into the website gives me the impression that it is run
by fundamentalist hate mongers.
However much you may object to the website housing the photo, you have
nto yet offered a shred of evidence to negate the assertion that
non-Muslims are not allowed into Arafat Makkah. If you really need a
more neutrally captioned photo, see
http://www.theraptureisathand.com/blog/index.php/2006/12/13/mecca-youre-not…
(though this site might be considered that of religious hate mongers as well)
Sincerely,
Silas Snider
Ec
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Silas Snider is a proud member of the Association of Wikipedians Who
Dislike Making Broad Judgements About the Worthiness of a General Category
of Article, and Who Are In Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad
Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They are Deletionist
(AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD) , and the Harmonious
Editing Club of Wikipedia.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------