[WikiEN-l] CSD T1

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Divisive and Inflammatory Behavior, was CSD T1
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] CSD T1
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Timwi wrote:
> Uhm... I'm completely flattered. WTH is the reasoning behind CSD T1? How 
> did that ever pass community concensus? I can't believe more than a 
> handful of people would agree to that! What on Earth is supposed to be 
> harmful about users proclaiming their view on religious or controversial 
> topics?
> 
> I don't get this.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a battleground for social, moral, or
religious issues.  Userbox templates and user templates group
Wikipedians into competing factions.  This infrastructure has been used
in the past to abuse our decision-making policies by vote-stacking.

If you really feel it is necessary to proclaim your religion on your
userpage, you can do it, but you don't need a template to do so.

- --
Ben McIlwain ("Cyde Weys")

~ Sub veste quisque nudus est ~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFEZNolvCEYTv+mBWcRAuQRAJwI4bK2ePyoXaLSJ5IgvGEGM7g8KACfauGU
40bI2f9bm+pDRRgswmEenN0=
=f46Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Divisive and Inflammatory Behavior, was CSD T1
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] CSD T1
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]