"Phil Boswell" wrote
My known family tree stretches back 27 generations,
and the
surname is spelt in very nearly that many ways. Originally "de Bossuille",
it has been "Bosvil" and "Boswil" at various times. Only in recent
generations has the spelling settled down, and even so the variant
"Boswall"
is still around: there's a famous TV producer of that name who's a distant
cousin.
In a sense though that discussion , valid for anyone pre-1600, is as much
about redirects. Any medieval-type person is quite likely to have six or
more synonymous names (Latin versions and vernacular, nicknames ...) and it
is our duty to the reader to create redirects. Variant surname orthography
is just part of that. On the whole I prefer one page per name ([[Millar]]
separate from [[Miller]]) unless tiny.
There is a discussion on Meta as to whether a
genealogy project should be
adopted under the Wikimedia Foundation umbrella: this kind of data would
be
invaluable for the kind of page Charles is describing. Imagine not simply
having to say "This John Smith is the one born in 1710" but also being
able
to say "This John Smith is in our genealogy wiki [[here]]" with a proper
link!
This might be a way in to thinking what it is we do want out of surname
pages (etymology of the name ... origins if geographically or otherwise
precise ... dynastic sweep for example as at [[Uys family]] ... ). I mainly
want to have the names listed in an easy-reference format. I'm not sure
about always adding dates, as per the MoS. It would definitely help in
deciding which John Smith out of many was the relevant one; otherwise it
duplicates article content and is just time-consuming to add.
There is a notability point here: dab pages don't need to assert notability,
because that is implicitly assumed from the existence of an article. The
MoS gets that right, in effect, in saying you don't write a short essay,
just the essentials. A genealogical project is interested in people who
procreate, which is not WP's criterion at all outside a few royal or
aristocratic or plutocratic contexts.
Charles