[WikiEN-l] Unblock-en-l

Wed Jun 28 19:47:31 UTC 2006

On 6/28/06, Dabljuh <dabljuh at gmx.net> wrote:
> So, we have a "reliable source", stating there would be no evidence regarding X.
> That statement is provably wrong since we find plenty of evidence for (and
> against) X just searching the journals. They simply didn't do their homework.
>
> But now, you conclude that we cannot in any way point out that the statement
> is provably wrong? Not even remove it altoghether to avoid confusion?
> You insist on keeping the provably wrong statement there, knowing,
> that it is indeed provably wrong?
>
> You insist to have something, that is
> verifiably, and provably, wrong, in Wikipedia,
> and you object to someone changing it?
>
> Because its not against the rules to write something wrong in an article,
> even when knowing that it is verifiably and provably wrong, as long as you
> can find a source that says it?

No idea where this all came from, but anyway: we always welcome people
pointing out errors, especially if there are verifiabhle sources for
them. Do it by email if you have to. But if you're going down the "I
was blocked because I'm right and they're wrong" road...well...please
don't.

Steve