[WikiEN-l] And you thought Pokémon was trivial...

Sat Jun 24 03:01:03 UTC 2006

On 6/23/06, Steve Bennett <stevagewp at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/24/06, maru dubshinki <marudubshinki at gmail.com> wrote:
> > There's plenty of common ground- this is an immediatist/eventualist
> > split, after all, and we all know that one day the Immediate moment
> > will have become the eventual. (In other words, as time passes and
> > articles improve, this issue will become less and less important until
> > it only makes sense in rare individual articles).
>
> Uh, is it not true that the number of bad articles is growing faster
> than the number of good articles? I'd always taken that as a given,
> based on our still rapid growth in sheer number of articles.
>
> Also, I'm just generally not comfortable with the situation that the
> Foundation Office wants things one way, but everyone else seems to
> want them another way (and everyone else is winning)...
>
> Steve

Yeah, but our growth in articles is also slowing down from the
exponential growth rates we'd previously enjoyed (or so my tea-leaf
reading of the statistics would indicate).

As for your second point, so what? The Foundation Office exists for
the sake of the "everyone else", not the other way around.

~maru