[WikiEN-l] And you thought Pokémon was trivial...

Sat Jun 24 02:14:51 UTC 2006

On 6/24/06, maru dubshinki <marudubshinki at gmail.com> wrote:
> There's plenty of common ground- this is an immediatist/eventualist
> split, after all, and we all know that one day the Immediate moment
> will have become the eventual. (In other words, as time passes and
> articles improve, this issue will become less and less important until
> it only makes sense in rare individual articles).

Uh, is it not true that the number of bad articles is growing faster
than the number of good articles? I'd always taken that as a given,
based on our still rapid growth in sheer number of articles.

Also, I'm just generally not comfortable with the situation that the
Foundation Office wants things one way, but everyone else seems to
want them another way (and everyone else is winning)...

Steve