[WikiEN-l] Spoiler Boilerplates

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] unblock namela
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Spoiler Boilerplates
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I'm trying to understand the relevence of this unnecessary nonsense, and I must conceed that the rebutals provided by fellow editors (a great deal of them newbies that just began editting the wiki ) is some strawman to do with consideration. For more elaborate discussion see [[User talk:Megaman Zero]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Spoiler warning#Guideline]].

Obviously we all work toward building a great encyclopedia. But what do these have to do with that quality...? I'm quite confused by this. Days of discussion and not user in support of the template in question can provide one. Was there some demand by readers to implement this...? This seems quite utterly out of the boundries of a neutral editor at wikipedia to decide upon. 

How on earth can a encyclopedia spoil a reader by being an encyclopedia...? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a forum for netquitette relations. I humbly beg the community to clarify upon this matter and reconsider carefully the precense of this useless template upon wikipedia.

 		
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Sports Fantasy Football ’06 - Go with the leader. Start your league today! 

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] unblock namela
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Spoiler Boilerplates
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]