Re: [WikiEN-l] Blocked for 36 hours

Why? I really believe that this user should not have any administrative privilages, it is not like I accuse every admins which I accounter. This admin fail to understand why such tools are given to him, he has hard time understanding that those tools should be used with something in mind ''what I am doing is above all for the best of the articles which constitute Wikipedia'' and Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and articles are what matters. This, this admin does not understand. He is using his tools because he is criticised, I wonder if in the real world any judge being criticised could sue someone and be the plaintif and the judge in the same time. What is disruptive in Wikipedia are revert warring, POV pushing, all the sort of things that disrupt the quality of the articles, not some abarsive words which any admin could edit from a user who has enought of POV warriors who build hateful websites and after being bored there recycle themselves in Wikipedia and once in a while in his answers of hundreds of words use a word which could be interpreted by some as personal attack. I have never been blocked for 3RR and I shall never be, because I know that such behaviors are really disruptive since the victim is the article. I know to restrain myself and I don't need someone to tell me I am in the wrong, worst, I don't need someone who thinks I am in the wrong and has tools to impose his misconceptions of the rules. Also, this admin is seriously disrupting in his behaviors, who the hell do he think he is? Members are reporting others in his talk page and then he go on to distribute warnings as if they were cake. I have been reported by a user who was the other side of the conflict, and I have never used such cheap tactics to get someone silenced, when it happens that both sides have used such words. Right now, I am blocked and there is not one admin that has warned this user, who's autority I contest, for his misbehavior, please just read the example which I have requested any admin to answer on whatever or not it is a warning material. It was not, and even he realise it was not, while he placed it as personal attack, he then presented it as not assuming good faith, which neither was the cases. Such admins are even more disruptive, because by blocking users like this they prevent those users to contribute, this is really harmful for Wikipedia. And I am really tired of this silence. Nathan - Mailing Lists <lists(a)home.nathanr.com> wrote: Fadix: Questioning an admin's capability is generally Not A Good Idea[tm]. I wouldn't resort to this myself and I've said some things that have been pretty disruptive. - Nathan (User:nathanrdotcom) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l --------------------------------- All new Yahoo! Mail --------------------------------- Get news delivered. Enjoy RSS feeds right on your Mail page. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l