[WikiEN-l] (fwd) Re:PatCheng and the mailing list

Considering the fact that PatCheng continues to rant and rave in the mailing list, might you inform them as to the fact that he is returning via anon IPs to continue his harassment and disruptive revert warring? Please post this, along with any comment of your own you may have. You can see on his first ranting <http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-June/048757.html>, among other things, that he was observing the Talk:Abu Musab al-Zarqawi page when I briefly visited it around the time of the reports of his death. He mentions my removal <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Abu_Musab_al-Zarqawi&diff=prev&oldid=57546346> of a clear and unambiguous personal attack on other editors, which was curiously put back in its place by an anon <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Abu_Musab_al-Zarqawi&diff=prev&oldid=57559746> who was traversing through several articles I had edited, whether with my name or anonymously. <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=139.168.71.93> This obvious sockpuppet was blocked by Blnguyen, and since that time two more anon IPs have showed up <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=138.130.126.104> <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=144.131.110.42>, with all three IPs tracing to the same provider in Australia (where PatCheng admits he is from), <http://www.apnic.net/apnic-bin/whois.pl?searchtext=139.168.71.93> <http://www.apnic.net/apnic-bin/whois.pl?searchtext=138.130.126.104> <http://www.apnic.net/apnic-bin/whois.pl?searchtext=144.131.110.42> doing much the same thing, including straight reverts of content <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bill_Gertz&diff=prev&oldid=59029048> and summary reverts which practically constitute vandalism because of the various fixes <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Students_for_a_Free_Tibet&diff=prev&oldid=59026219>. Not only is he not interested in discussion and compromise, much less a quality article, but he should not be editing in the first place given that no one has sanctioned his return. In other words, he has not merely created blatant sockpuppets to extend his campaign for parole, he is busy continuing the same disruptive practices that helped to get him blocked in the first place. He obviously feels he has the license to behave this way unimpeded in any case, but is on the mailing list simply to seek official sanction for administrators to do so with their blessing. I hope everyone can now see his crocodile tears for what they are. Sincerely, TJive