On 6/13/06, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net> wrote:
I'm afraid he is a notable figure. We should not
have some kind of
hatchet job on him, but someone who has engaged in all the public
activity he has is certain deserving of a Wikipedia article. Of
course, he is not a terrorist in the sense Timothy McVeigh was; he is
just a critic. He makes a point now and then, but from the
perspective of users whose privacy is at risk he is more of a
destructive vandal. His point about anonymous people wielding power
has some traction, but I notice that folks who edit under their own
name receive more or less the same treatment as people who use
pseudonyms.
Er, apart from having been a bit of a prune with respect to a certain,
well-known encyclopaedia site, what has he done that is notable? How
is he different to any other public nuisance? Has he featured in any
print newspaper articles? Surely we don't have articles on anyone who
has ever stalked anyone?
Steve