It would be really nice if you stopped using the phrase "you wrote" with
everything that you quote. I would be more enlightening if you
identified the person who really said whatever is quoted. Doing so is
certainly the norm for contributors to this list.
Ec
Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:49:39 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
I was wondering if you could review the proposals.
If
you think that the concerns are valid and that the
suggestions made in the proposals has some merit, I
would be glad to discuss the issue (not the problems
but the possible solutions which I think are
reasonable) further. I have a couple of similar
suggestions that I believe are critical and can be
useful to gently modify the structure of the project
and prepare it for the future if it will be expanding
in the years to come.
Don't tell me: one of them calls for the removal of images which a
small minority of editors find offensive from articles on important
events, and another one calls for administrators to be prevented from
blocking users who unilaterally remove content they find offensive
despite overwhelming consensus to keep it? Am I close?