[WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 6/5/06, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa at gmail.com> wrote:
> That obviously isn't even remotely true.  Look at the latest RfC:
> people who object to *refactoring a talk page* because the aim is to
> remove useless and intrusive formatting.  I'd say "fuck process" here
> because, really, process is simply being used as an obstacle to the
> simple act of improving the editing environment by removing useless
> crap.

It is not an effective method of doing so. People have thosands of
signatureas and anoying them makes it less liekly they are going to
simplify their signitures in future.

In terms of effective methods I prefer the software side solution of
switching off the ability to modify sigs.

Other than that asking people to modify thier sigs on their talk pages
is more effective in the long term.

-- 
geni

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]