[WikiEN-l] The admin problem

Sat Jun 3 23:06:11 UTC 2006

Where and how are we going to find anonymous experts?

Fred

On Jun 3, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Sam Spade wrote:

> On 6/3/06, Fred Bauder <fredbaud at ctelco.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 3, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Sam Spade wrote:
>>
>>
>>> process of
>>> competant peer review
>>>
>>
>> Do you have a link to that?
>>
>> Fred
>>
>
> If your asking where I asked for one, you'd have to scroll up in this
> thread. If your asking for  a link about one, see
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review
>
> If your trying to understand what I'm talking about, I'm asking for a
> competent process of peer review to resolve the myriad disputes that
> brought me before you. That way we could have quality, peer reviewed
> articles instead of personality driven conflicts.
>
> If you haven't noticed, I care about article quality, and am in no way
> "rogue". The idea that I should be put on "probation" due to having
> had annoyed a popular wiki-personality, rather than that the article
> disputes in question could use a thorough review astounds me.
>
> Bottom line, is the wikipedia a web-community or an encyclopedia?
>
> If it is an encyclopedia, can we please stop with all these games, and
> find a way to resolve content disputes?
>
> If it is a web-community, I have no interest in it, and intend to  
> leave.
>
> Your no judge, I'm no criminal, and the only thing on "probation"
> around here is the wikipedia, which I will abstain from editing until
> this is resolved to my satisfaction. Either way I sternly recommend
> you find a better way to encourage your contributors.
>
> SS
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>