[WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 6/1/06, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/2/06, George Herbert <george.herbert at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Your attitude that it's ok to move beyond that into actually pissing
> them
> > off, and doing things like rejecting RfCs out of hand merely because
> they're
> > silly, is a serious problem.
>
> Obviously not.  There comes a point at which one must simply recognise
> that a completely and utterly fatuous complaint is being made, and
> move on.
>

One RFC?  Sure.  One particularly upset complaintant?  Sure.

Your kickback from the community is far, far past that.

Again: Other editors and admins, even ones who do a lot of potentially very
controversial stuff, don't get a fraction of the community hostility that
you do.

It's not what you're doing.  It's how you do it.  Your attitude, displayed
above and elsewhere, is a problem.


-- 
-george william herbert
gherbert at retro.com / george.herbert at gmail.com

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]