On 1/29/06, Haukur Þorgeirsson <haukurth(a)hi.is> wrote:
Yes but determining who decides what is
"good" and what is "crap" is
the basic problem here.
This is the job of AfD and DRV. When AfD fails, DRV is supposed to
correct the error. This isn't rocket science.
But DRV also gets out-of-process speedy deletions. If it votes solely
based on content then we've effectively lowered the bar for deleting
something down to 50% support as long as you can find an admin to do the
dirty work. That sends your precious "when in doubt, don't delete" out the
window.
Not at all. If the speedy is undeleted while being discussed on DRV,
there's nothing to stop someone cleaning it up listing it in good
faith on AfD. That's the beauty of having (non-problematic) articles
undeleted while on DRV. The article becomes visible, editable and
improvable and if it ends up going to AfD and being kept there then so
much the better.