On 1/24/06, Sean Barrett <sean(a)epoptic.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
joalex stated for the record:
friends,
que 1) Ragib did the right thing -- you are a vandal.
que 2) What is this "freedom of the press" thing you refer to?
ans to the que 1:
I tried to correct the important things regarding the history of india and
pakistan. since he was in favour of the pakistan(He is a Bangladesi) He
always want to do the facts in favour of the pakistan where as I tried to
act in a neutral way.
ans to the que 2:
Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia that everyone can edit. So I have the right
to work in my own way. I haven't tried to modify any part of the work
illegly by writing on the work done by me but he always do so because the
article regarding Baloochistan freedom fighting was done by me.ask him
whether he had done it or not. He illegly pointed to avert the matter in
favour of pakistan.Dude tell me is it correct or not? Is there no right to
argue in a neutrel point of view, so that the motto of wikipedia itself is
adverted.........
Que regarding obsecureness:
I tried to contact Ragib,but he refused to contact me. so there is no way to
state my arguements.How can I express a thing if there is no chance of
contacting him? This was a one side tracking by that illegal editor.I done
it as my last chance.He ignored the respone so badly.
joe