I'd support changes like that, actually. The problem, as always, is
that what's obvious to one person is not always obvious to all. I am
concerned, therefore, that people could feel cut off from their
ability to participate by one admin's "obvious" decision. Perhaps the
solution is to have people say '''Speedy Merge''' or similar, and
do
so once a few people have agreed to that idea?
SCZenz
On 1/23/06, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/23/06, SCZenz <sczenz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ok, so you're saying that undeletion
doesn't need oversight, but crap
deletion does? Aren't crap deletions supposed to be shot down by the
community just as well-reasoned BOLD undeletions are supported?
I don't have a great overweening analysis of the thing, I just
undelete good stuff that gets deleted (and I've had to do too much of
that, recently). What I've said on this and other threads is that I
agree with the idea of defetishizing the deletion process. I've
expressed support for the idea of letting people cut an AfD short by
make obvious merges and redirects, for instance.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l