I know I'm getting into this late, but I'm gonna start from the top anyway...
Why not reform WP:DRV into something everyone can live with? We could
give it more authority to overrule AfD, based on things other than
process, for example. If you want oversight of AfD nominations, by
all means put it there--but I don't think having a single person with
broad review powers is a good idea at all.
SCZenz
On 1/22/06, David Gerard <fun(a)thingy.apana.org.au> wrote:
Some AFD regulars seem to view AFD/DRV as an independent fiefdom which
claims dominion over all Wikipedia content, but resists all comment from
outside (e.g. wikien-l) as interference. *Unfortunately*, it's been causing
real problems for the Foundation of late. Unbelievable rudeness about
outsiders, stupendously crap nominations to make a point, actively driving
away outside experts, etc.
Here is a suggestion: good faith is not enough when the good-faith actions
are stupidly destructive. Incivility on *FD = 24 hour ban from all *FD
pages and deletion of comment. Sufficiently crap nomination = 1 month ban
from all *FD pages.
Ideas?
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l