On 1/22/06, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/23/06, Matt Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Of those 200 per day, how many /should/ be on
afd? As opposed to
speedyable or should have been dealt with another way (e.g. merge).
Quite. There are a few unverifiables (real unverifiables, not the
nonsense about announcements of licensing deals by two companies being
unverifiable) and we could probably find an innovative alternative to
AfD for those.
I'm strongly in favor of giving this ago. Many AfD articles are
obvious merges or redirects and shouldn't ever see AfD at all.
That reminds me. Why are people allowed to vote Merge or Redirect on AfD in
the first place?
--
I'm not stupid, just selectively ignorant.