As cited, using Wikipedia as a forum for unsourced criticism of Prof. Harvey
Klehr occurs here
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Americans_in_the_Ven…
"It is about the legacy of the Cold War, anticommunist Witch Hunts,
Red-baiting, and McCarthyism. Haynes and Klehr and Romerstein are part of a
project to make it appear that violations of civil liberties during the Cold
War and McCarthyism were justified"
Here the "project" becomes the "Venona Posse project"
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&…
Here he refers to Prof. Klehr's work as "outrageous McCarthyite POV
Red-baiting defamatory Blacklist
"
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Americans_in_the_Venona_p…
"berlet posse" bring up 673 Google results
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=berlet+posse&btnG=Google+Search
*All* linked to "right-wing extremist groups." See for example SourceWatch
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Chip_Berlet
"Berlet specializes in tracking and analyzing right-wing movements. He has
written about the John Birch Society, armed militias, Ku Klux Klan, Posse
Comitatus, Aryan Nations, Christian Identity, racist skinheads, and the
Lyndon LaRouche fascist cult."
These smears fail Wikipedia *policy (policy, *i.e., a rule)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civility#Examples
and are defamatory. Nonetheless, ArbCom remonstrances failed consideration
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Nobs01_and_…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Nobs01_and_…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Nobs01_and_…
The record is clear, and issues have not changed. It should be noted, I have
chosen to work within the project regarding the host of criticisms directed
at Wikipedia's credibility, and not taken my case outside Wikipedia, despite
a genuine interest in what has been termed the "cultic" nature of concerted
efforts to censor and silence people of good will inside Wikipedia
Nobs01