On 1/16/06, Brock Batsell <wikipedia(a)theskeptik.com> wrote:
For reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%
3ALog&type=&user=&page=User%3AKDRGibby
And I suggest you read up about what vandalism is and what is a
content dispute, because the exemption for 3RR only applies to the
first.
Regards,
[[en:User:Bbatsell]]
No it doesn't. 3RR can be about any edit unless there's a concensus. One
should always discuss a change and try to come to an agreement rather than
revert more than 3 times. If it's clearly vandalism and everyone but the
vandal agrees to that, 3RR is in fact not a problem at all. Vandalism can
always be reverted (though usually it's best to still not violate 3RR). In
content disputes you always need to take care not to break the 3 revert
rule.
Mgm