On 1/12/06, Anthony DiPierro <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
It doesn't have to be a "proper stub" to
be "better than nothing". A
simple one-liner stating whatever it is you know that verifies that
the topic is reasonably worthy should be enough. If the article is
"worse than nothing", then surely it's worse than a one-line stub, so
you've improved the article and punted the problem to those people who
like to delete things.
A one liner turns all the links blue. Fewer people will then notice
that it needs some serious expansion.
--
geni